>>429
Thank you.
If you apply the current conditions, I think the restrictions can be expressed like this.

Clamp(1.2,(1.2 + 0.05 * (ATK_ELEMENT - DEF_ELEMENT)),2.0)

Clamp(0.2,(0.8 - 0.05 * (DEF_ELEMENT - ATK_ELEMENT)),0.8)

However, since it is easy to reach the upper/lower limits if left like this, I would appreciate it if you could also refer to >>226,234.